Thinking Activity:Culture studies in Practice: Hamlet and To His Coy Mistress

Study of  Hamlet

Rosencrantz and Guildenstern both are marginalized characters in this novel. Let see the approach Shakespeare's Hamlet with a view to seeing power in its cultural context.

        Hamlet is a powerful position of the man Hamlet's father killed by his uncle  Claudius and after his father's death, his uncle becomes king so here we see the power of kingship. finally, hamlet is decided to revenge his uncle. After the play within the play, Claudius is talking very privately with Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. This character is jealousy of hamlet because the novel is the most important of hamlet. He is a domestic or violent man. Hamlet's fellow students from Wittenberg and with this response to Claudius plan to send Hamlet to England. Both an excellent set of metaphors and a summation of the Elizabethan concept of the role and power of kingship. 

The singular and peculiar life is bound with all the strength and armor of the mind to keep itself from noyance, but much more That spirit upon whose weal depends and rests The lives of many. The cease of majesty died not alone, but like a gulf doth draw what's near it with it? It is a massy wheel Fixed on the summit of the highest mount. To whose huge spokes ten thousand lesser things are mortised and adjoined; which, when it falls each small annexment, petty consequences attends the boisterous ruin. Never alone Did the king sigh out with a general groan?

 The passage is a thoughtful one. It is praiseworthy of a wise and accomplished statesman. The novel is the most important of the power or they can have very sophisticated of the way. Hamlet soliloquies, king’s soliloquy of  conscience his futile efforts to pray to God have been considering the line as Rosencrantz’s speech   

    " Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are among the jellyfish of Shakespeare's characters” Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are a marginalization character in the Shakespeare novel.  Both are voiceless and it is easy to forget which of the two speaks. He is a very beautiful or modern character in the play. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are distinctly plot-driven empty of personality in a different way and eager to curry favor with power even if it means spying on their erstwhile friend. This novel is two characters of marginalized, then let us look upon Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. There are different from the novel. 

The meaning of the name

The meaning of their name it different or hardly match what seems to be the essence of their characters. Murray J. Levith is written by Rosencrantz – “Garland of rose” or  Guildenstern – “Golden star”

   

Their character is a very different individual, corporative. But most important of Hamlet because is a central hero or protagonist of the play. All the think of the power distance. This detail does not seem to fit the personalities and general vacuity of Shakespeare’s two incompetents. All that the two characters are tell us and let see what they do. We know that simply they are the students at Wittenberg. Claudius sends them with Hamlet. They both may not have to content of that letter or “Grand commotion”

       

They must sweep my way, And marshal me to knavery. Let it work, for it’s the sport to have the engineer hoist with his own petard. And it shall go hard but I will delve one yard below their mines And blow them to the moon: Oh,’ it’s most sweet When in one line two crafts directly meet.

    So all those things are shows cultural distance and power distance. The people are alike Shakespeare's novel because they are the use of very different or simple language. Hamlet's character is a philosophical or very domestic of the way.    There is someone who said that Sometimes people take the advice to write what you know pretty literally like Shakespeare, who failed Hamlet with self-conscious references to the working of the theater, but it is not just for lack of other material. Shakespeare very well presented the whole novel and if ever we wished to study two characters who are marginalized, then let us look upon Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. There are power conflict men or very powerfull characters of the play. 

Power comes from different situations and also behavior, where Hamlet's madness gives power to Claudius Hamlet’s behavior is very different or there are create to a Claudius because Claudius kills to hamlet's father. Claudius was aware of power, clearly when he observed of Hamlet's

 “ Madness in great ones must not unwatched go”      

The two-character death of the 20th century. For such is power in the world of kings and princes. The use of language is in that de-contraction or very simplified. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are a marginalization hero are archetypal human being caught up on ship nowhere except to death.  Nor is it merely a literary construct. England had known the effects of such power off and on for centuries.

Study of “To his coy mistress.           

Marvell’s romantic tour-de-force To His Coy Mistress is a rigorous representation of the spiritual and physical aspect of love.  It is a great poem on carpe diem tradition wherein we are confronted with a passionate speaker or lover who is requesting his beloved to forsake her shyness or modesty and submit herself to his embraces. The lover repeatedly offers a series of arguments in support of his proposition. With thoughtful wit and humor, he justifies that human life is essentially short-lived and thus it is wise to gratify sexual passion while they still have time at their disposal. Hence, he appeals to his beloved to stop the lingering and expedite the pleasures of the flesh.

At the very beginning of the poem, spiritual courtship is presented with a similar style and manner found in the poems of Petrarch. This is noted especially when the lover commends his beloved’s physical beauty. Just akin to a typical Petrarchan lover, the speaker praises the beauty of his beloved’s eyes and limbs in an extravagant manner. Afterward, the speaker’s spiritual love subsides and he tends towards the physical relationship. This urge for physical love has been reinforced through the carpe diem concept. By presenting the images of death and decay the speaker tries to justify the futility of resistance towards carnal pleasure:

Through the above coarse imagery, the speaker throws an implication towards his beloved to sacrifice her virginity to him rather than foolishly saving herself for the "worms" when buried. Then he also adds that after demise her virginity will be transformed into dust along with her body. He further adds that although the grave is a peaceful place none does make love there. Hence, death would definitely seize their opportunity to make love.