1. How far do you agree with the India
represented in the novel The White Tiger?
Ans:- The representation of India is advanced it is
also poor, corrupt, acting, and cheating. Surprisingly, I agree, not only
India, but all the countries in the world have this kind of bad problem. But
that doesn’t make it all bad. Adiga is clinging to the ghats of India. The
novel was short-lived in the years 2008, then progressing strongly. But even
after that, the fulfillment of that talk is the destruction of poverty,
corruption, and corruption in India. Landlords who live far away from some
places rule over the people of the city. Many people are also not properly
educated. So, not allowed by India, but introduced by Adiga, introduced by
“White Tiger”, but that’s not what we’re talking about.
(2) Do you believe that Balram's story is the
archetype of all stories of 'rags to riches'?
Ans:- We can see that at the end of the stories
depicting the poor as the central character make the poor rich. We can see a
lot of people who are like Balaram. Belonging to a poor and extended family,
who has not completed their studies, who goes to work from an early age and who
has insulted the rich. Such stories depict the struggle of the poor to achieve
their dream and to become rich. Ways to reach the goal of wealth may be
different in each story but suffering is always the same. So, in this way, we
can say that Balram's story is the wonder of all the stories of 'Ragathi
Reaches'.
(3) "Language bears within itself the
necessity of its own critique, deconstructive criticism aims to show that any
text inevitably undermines its own claims to have a determinate meaning, and
licences the reader to produce his own meanings out of it by an activity of
semantic 'free play' (Derrida, 1978, in Lodge, 1988, p. 108). Is it possible to
do deconstructive reading of The White Tiger? How?
Ans:- Yes, it is
possible to deconstruct "White Tiger". We can deconstruct it with the
help of Derrida's notion of the meaning of the free play. To break the language
we need to find its loose stone. The yellow stone of "The White
Tiger" is that Balram himself says that he is "semi-supported".
This word breaks the philosophy and all the ideals that Balram gives by giving
his own example. Because he is not fully educated. He understands things with
the limited power of analysis. He allocates deep shallow philosophies to his
shallow thoughts and thinking. For example, he compares the idea of killing
his master to gaining freedom with the knowledge of the Buddha.
No comments:
Post a Comment
if you have any knowledge. please let me know